Legal Opinion
Castaneda v. Souza
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided October 6, 2014No. 13-1994, 13-2509PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DYK, Circuit Judge.
In these consolidated habeas cases, we must determine whether the petitioners, two aliens, are subject to the mandatory-detention provision of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1226(c). Subsection 1226(c) provides that the Attorney General “shall take into custody any alien,” who has committed certain predicate crimes, “when the alien is released.” Unlike other aliens facing the possibility of removal from the United States, aliens subject to mandatory detention are generally ineligible for bail even if they show to the Attorney General’s satisfaction that…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Zadvydas v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Demore v. KimSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Reno v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Lora v. ShanahanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
- Castañeda v. SouzaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
- Minto v. DeckerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Culwick v. WoodDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2019
- Gordon v. LynchCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.