Lee v. Magnolia Bank
Mississippi Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, J.
Appellee filed its bill to remove cloud upon and to confirm title to certain lands. Appellants, together with the State of Mississippi and the Humble Oil and Refining Company, were made defendants. Answers were filed by all defendants except appellants.
Appellants were granted additional time to answer and upon failure so to do suffered a decree pro eonfesso. About six months thereafter they filed their motion to set aside this decree. From an adverse ruling thereupon they appeal.
The interlocutory appeal allowed by the chancellor was not ‘ ‘ to settle all the controlling principles involved in…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Woodson v. DoyleMississippi Supreme Court · 1944
3Cited by3 opinions
- Smith v. SmithMississippi Supreme Court · 1954
- Spearman v. HusseyMississippi Supreme Court · 1951
- Truman v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1954