Legal Opinion

Woodson v. Doyle

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 1944No. 35537PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

On Suggestion of Error.

2Opinion of the Court · AlexanderAlexander, J.

In our original opinion we affirmed the granting by the chancellor of a mandatory injunction against appellant. The prayer of appellee’s bill was for such in junction to restore water supply and for damages. The trial judge limited his findings to the right of injunction reserving the.merits. Appeal was allowed by the chancellor “to settle the principles.”

No point having been made as to the right of appeal, and the hearing having- been upon bill, answer and proof, we entertained the appeal. Upon suggestion of error doubt as to the appealability suggested itself to us,…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Liberty Trust Co. v. Planters' BankMississippi Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Alexander v. WoodsMississippi Supreme Court · 1912
  3. State Board of Barber Examiners v. BroomMississippi Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Reynolds v. City of New AlbanyMississippi Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Vicksburg Waterworks Co. v. Mayor of VicksburgCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1907

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hyde Construction Co. v. Highway Materials Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Holmes v. Board of SupervisorsMississippi Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Lee v. Magnolia BankMississippi Supreme Court · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API