Legal Opinion

Sacramento Cable Television v. City of Sacramento

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 20, 1991No. C008372PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PUGLIA, P. J.

Plaintiffs Sacramento Cable Television (SCT) and Christine Barney appeal from a judgment dismissing their challenge to a tax imposed by defendant City of Sacramento (City) on users of cable television service. Plaintiffs contend the tax violates both the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and the franchise agreement between City and SCT. The trial court granted summary judgment to defendants, concluding the tax, which also applies to telephone, gas, and electric utilities, is one of general applicability and is rationally based. We shall affirm.

I

SCT is a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Near v. Minnesota Ex Rel. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Lovell v. City of GriffinSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Douglas v. City of JeannetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Minneapolis Star & Tribune Co. v. Minnesota Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Leathers v. MedlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Campos v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  2. Cequel III Communications I, LLC v. Local Agency Formation Commission of Nevada CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  3. Greening v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API