Legal Opinion

Markman v. Bi-State Transit System

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided July 13, 1970No. 54699PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARDGETT, Judge.

Action for damages in which plaintiff bus passenger sought to recover $35,000 for personal injuries against defendant carrier. Trial resulted in a jury verdict for defendant. Thereafter, the court sustained plaintiff’s motion for new trial upon the ground that the verdict was against the greater weight of the evidence. Defendant has appealed from the order granting a new trial.

Respondent has moved this court, pursuant to Civil Rule 83.09, V.A.M.R., to dismiss this appeal for failure of appellant to set forth a “fair and concise statement of the facts * * * relevant to the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McCloskey Ex Rel. McCloskey v. KoplarSupreme Court of Missouri · 1932
  2. Cluck v. AbeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  3. Harke v. HaaseSupreme Court of Missouri · 1934
  4. Clark v. Quality Dairy CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
  5. Plas-Chem Corporation v. Solmica, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Daniels v. SmithMissouri Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. Nance v. KimbrowSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
  3. The Aetna Casualty and Surety Company and Southwestern Bell Telephone Company v. General Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
  4. Hautly Cheese Co. v. Wine Brokers, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Goodin v. MayMissouri Court of Appeals · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API