Legal Opinion

Ohio Civil Rights Commission v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 3, 2003No. 2002-0150PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPfeifer, J.

{¶ 1} On June 23, 1999, Eric and Yonda Williams filed a charge with the Chicago, Illinois office of the Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”). The charge alleged that appellees, Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., and two alleged agents (collectively, “Countrywide”), engaged in sex discrimination and family-status discrimination by not considering Mrs. Williams’s salary during the loan-application process because she was on maternity leave. On August 3, 1999, HUD notified Countrywide of the charge. HUD referred the charge to the Ohio Civil Rights Commission (“OCRC”). On August 10,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dorrian v. Scioto Conservancy DistrictOhio Supreme Court · 1971
  2. State v. GolphinOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State ex rel. General Motors Corp. v. Ohio Civil Rights CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1977

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Asti v. Ohio Department of Youth ServicesOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  3. State ex rel. Ohio Democratic Party v. BlackwellOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State ex rel. Cincinnati Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Boggs v. Ohio Real Estate CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 2009

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API