Legal Opinion

DiCarlo v. Mazzarella

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 13, 1999PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAbrams, J.

The plaintiffs, trustees of the Dino Realty Trust (trust), filed a complaint in the Probate and Family Court for reformation of the trust created by the late Dino DiCarlo.4 The plaintiffs allege that, due to a scrivener’s error, the trust language is ambiguous and as a result the declaration of trust fails to give effect to the settlor’s intent. At the request of the parties, a Probate Court judge reserved and reported the case to the Ap*249peals Court. See G. L. c. 215, § 13; Mass. R. Civ. R 64, 365 Mass. 831 (1974). We granted the plaintiffs’ application for direct appellate review. See…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. Estate of BoschSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Berman v. SandlerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  3. Mazzola v. MyersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  4. Pond v. PondMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  5. Babson v. BabsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Walker v. WalkerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
  2. Flannery v. McNamaraMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  3. Van Riper v. Van RiperMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
  4. Bellemare v. ClermontMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2007
  5. Dwyer v. DwyerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API