DiCarlo v. Mazzarella
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtAbrams, J.
The plaintiffs, trustees of the Dino Realty Trust (trust), filed a complaint in the Probate and Family Court for reformation of the trust created by the late Dino DiCarlo.4 The plaintiffs allege that, due to a scrivener’s error, the trust language is ambiguous and as a result the declaration of trust fails to give effect to the settlor’s intent. At the request of the parties, a Probate Court judge reserved and reported the case to the Ap*249peals Court. See G. L. c. 215, § 13; Mass. R. Civ. R 64, 365 Mass. 831 (1974). We granted the plaintiffs’ application for direct appellate review. See…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Commissioner v. Estate of BoschSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Berman v. SandlerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
- Mazzola v. MyersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
- Pond v. PondMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
- Babson v. BabsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Walker v. WalkerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
- Flannery v. McNamaraMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
- Van Riper v. Van RiperMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
- Bellemare v. ClermontMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2007
- Dwyer v. DwyerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.