Parrott Mechanical, Inc. v. Rude
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.
An account stated requires written evidence of a statement of an account balance and some evidence of mutual assent that the amount stated is the final balance to date. The appellants here, Howard and Delvona Rude, were agents and principals of Rude Enterprises, a construction project owner and developer. At the same time, the Rudes were officers and agents of Parrott Mechanical, Inc., a project subcontractor. In their multiple capacities, the Rudes created and submitted, then accepted and certified to *862a mortgage company, periodic Parrott invoices. But Rude Enterprises never paid Parrott. And…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Young v. Key Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
- Central Washington Bank v. Mendelson-Zeller, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
- Margola Associates v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- Alexander v. County of Walla WallaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
- McGill v. HillCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Associated Petroleum Products, Inc. v. Northwest Cascade, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- Associated Petroleum Products, Inc. v. Northwest Cascade, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- Wirtz v. GilloglyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- Wirtz v. GILLOGLYCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- Parrott Mechanical, Inc. v. RudeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.