Legal Opinion

Arthur Lopez v. United States of America, et al.

District Court, S.D. California

Decided August 19, 2026No. 3:26-cv-03652Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 ARTHUR LOPEZ, Case No.: 26-cv-3652-BJC-AHG 14 Plaintiff, ORDER: 15 v. (1) GRANTING APPLICATION TO 16 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., PROCEED IN FORMA PAPUERIS; AND 17 Defendants. 18 (2) DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE 19 20 On June 22, 2026, Plaintiff Arthur Lopez, proceeding pro se, filed a Complaint, ECF 21 No. 1, along with a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF No. 2, a motion to appoint 22 counsel, ECF No. 3, a motion for leave to electronically file, ECF No. 4, and a “request to 23 file…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. Ivey v. Board of Regents of University of AlaskaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
  5. Jesse J. Calhoun v. Donald N. Stahl James BrazeltonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API