Legal Opinion

United States v. Leo G. Kelly

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided February 12, 1999No. 96-3102PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COFFEY, Circuit Judge.

Defendant-Appellant Leo Kelly (“Kelly”) appeals his conviction for knowingly causing the transportation of hazardous waste to a facility lacking a permit to dispose of such waste, and knowingly causing the disposal thereof without a permit, in violation of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (“RCRA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 6928(d)(1) and (d)(2), respectively. Kelly challenges the jury instructions as excluding certain statutory elements of the crimes charged and relieving the government of its burden of proof on the issue of Kelly’s knowledge. We affirm.

I. BACKGROUND

From…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. Kory C. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  2. United States v. Thong Vang and Neng VueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  3. Zands v. NelsonDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1991
  4. PaineWebber Income Properties Three Ltd. Partnership Ex Rel. Third Income Properties, Inc. v. Mobil Oil Corp.District Court, M.D. Florida · 1995
  5. United States v. Luis A. PerezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Zia U. Hasham v. California State Board of EqualizationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  2. United States v. WebberCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  3. United States v. Ruben HughesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  4. United States v. Gregory SwanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
  5. United States v. Gregory SwanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API