Legal Opinion

Edmonds v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 15, 1881PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Prom tlie Circuit Court of Russell. Tried before the Hon. II. D. Clayton.

1Opinion of the CourtSomeryille, J.

The indictment in this case charges the defendant with the larceny of a hog,/which, under the statute, is made a felony, without reference to the value of the animal stolen. — Code, 1876, § 4358. The only evidence in the case, showing any caption, or asportation of the animal, was the testimony of an accomplice, one Wad worth, who máde the following statement: A“That shortly after dark, on the 18th of February last, witness met defendant near the horse-lot, on the plantation of one Ilges; that the two went together to witness’ house, where the latter procured an axe, and they then returned to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chapman, Lyon & Noyes v. CowlesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1867
  2. Wolf v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1868
  3. State v. . JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1871
  4. Teat v. LeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1839

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Blakeney v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  2. Milam v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  3. Molton v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
  4. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  5. Kemp v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API