Legal Opinion

In Re: Application of Stephen Shefsky for an Order to Take Discovery for Use in Foreign Proceedings Under 28 U.S.C. 1782

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided May 20, 2024No. 2:23-cv-00633Unknown

1Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 * * * 4 IN RE APPLICATION OF STEPHEN Case No. 2:23-cv-00633-JCM-BNW SHEFSKY FOR AN ORDER TO TAKE 5 DISCOVERY FOR USE IN FOREIGN ORDER PROCEEDINGS UNDER

28 U.S.C. § 1782

6 7 8 Before the Court is Wynn’s Motion to Quash, which also challenges the sufficiency of 9 Petitioner Stephen Shefsky’s application for foreign discovery under 28 U.S.C. § 1782. ECF 10 No. 22. Shefsky opposed and moved to compel. ECF No. 27. Each party filed replies in support 11 of their underlying motions. ECF Nos. 29 and 32. Because Shefsky has demonstrated that his 12…

2Cases cited27 opinions

Harold D. Blankenship, an Individual v. The Hearst Corporation, a Corporation, William H. Myers, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
Hallett v. MorganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
Intel Corp. v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
Wendy Wagner v. Federal Election CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
Louisiana Pacific Corp. v. Money Market 1 Institutional Investment DealerDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2012

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.