Legal Opinion

Video Zone, Inc. v. KF&F Properties, L.C.

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided April 23, 2004No. Record 031486PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Keenan

In this appeal, we consider whether the circuit court erred in holding that the terms of a commercial lease required a tenant to replace certain heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) equipment located primarily on the roof of the leased premises.

The following facts are relevant to this appeal. KF&F Properties, L.C. (KF&F), owns the Rodman Shopping Center in the City of Portsmouth. In 1996, KF&F leased certain property within the shopping center to Video Zone, Inc. (Video Zone), for the purpose of operating a “video store” on the premises. The lease had an initial term of five…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Prospect Development Co. v. BershaderSupreme Court of Virginia · 1999
  2. Eure v. Norfolk Shipbuilding & Drydock Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2002
  3. Granite State Insurance v. BottomsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1992
  4. Tuomala v. Regent UniversitySupreme Court of Virginia · 1996
  5. First National Exchange Bank v. Roanoke Oil Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1937

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. EQT Production Company v. Robert AdairCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
  2. Pocahontas Min. Ltd. v. Cnx Gas Co., LLCSupreme Court of Virginia · 2008
  3. 3D Global Solutions, Inc. v. MVM, INC.District Court, District of Columbia · 2008
  4. Nextel WIP Lease Corp. v. SaundersSupreme Court of Virginia · 2008
  5. Ott v. L & J HOLDINGS, LLCSupreme Court of Virginia · 2008

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API