Crawford v. Ribbon Technology Corp.
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
George, Judge.
Peter Harwood and Buckley, King & Bluso, appellants (“Harwood”), appeal from a judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas, which adopted the magistrate’s decision awarding defendant-appellee, Ribbon Technology Corporation (“Ribtec”), expenses and attorney fees, as a result of frivolous conduct by Harwood.
The facts underlying the sanctions against Harwood are as follows. Harwood represented Richard A. Crawford, plaintiff, in a suit against defendants, alleging that Ribtec breached employment and deferred compensation agreements. After mandatory arbitration, two awards…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- Ron Scheiderer & Associates v. City of LondonOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- State ex rel. Lesher v. KainradOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- Ivywood Apartments v. BennettOhio Court of Appeals · 1976
- Murrell v. Williamsburg Local School DistrictOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bennett v. MartinOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- Spinner v. BargerOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
- Warino v. Worldwide News Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013