Legal Opinion

Ron Scheiderer & Associates v. City of London

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1998No. 96-2384PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.

The question presented is whether attorney fees incurred by a party moving for sanctions under former R.C. 2323.51 may be included in an award pursuant to the statute.1 Our analysis of the plain language of the statute compels the conclusion that former R.C. 2323.51 permits an award based upon a finding of frivolous' conduct to include attorney fees incurred in prosecuting a motion for sanctions. Pursuant to former R.C. 2323.51(B)(4), this award may be made against a party, the party’s counsel of record, or both. Therefore, we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

Former R.C. 2323.51…

2Cited by35 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Striker v. ClineOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Stone v. House of Day Funeral Service, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Calypso Asset Mgt., L.L.C. v. 180 Indus., L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. Taneff v. LipkaOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  5. Bennett v. MartinOhio Court of Appeals · 2013

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API