Legal Opinion

Jellison v. Halloran

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 20, 1889PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the district court for Hennepin county, Baxter, J., presiding, (acting for a judge of the fourth district.)

1Opinion of the Court

Dickinson, J.1

This is an action under the statute to determine adverse claims to real estate, the complaint alleging title in the plaintiff, and that the land is vacant and unoccupied. At the trial of the cause the court granted a motion, made on the part of the plaintiff, for judgment on the pleadings. This appeal is from the judgment so allowed.

It becomes necessary to consider the effect of the answer. The answer embraces a general denial of each and every allegation of the complaint, “except that which is hereinafter expressly admitted, specifically denied, or qualified.” It then admits…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Griffin v. . Long Island Railroad Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. Myrick v. CoursalleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
  3. Day v. Putnam InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1871
  4. Hooper v. HenrySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
  5. Windom v. SchuppelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Dever v. CornwellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1901
  2. State v. RosenquistNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Rogers v. Clark Iron Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  4. Pinney v. Russell & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  5. Wheeler v. Winnebago Paper MillsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API