Legal Opinion

Macutis v. Cudahy Packing Co.

District Court, D. Nebraska

Decided February 13, 1913No. 115PublishedCited by 11 opinions

At Law. Action by Tony Macutis against the Cudahy Packing Company and Daniel Enright. On motion to remand to state court.

1Opinion of the Court

T. C. MUNGER, District Judge.

This cause was begun in the state court, and removed to this court on petition of the defendant Cudahy Packing Company, showing diversity of citizenship between plaintiff and itself. The case is now presented upon a motion to remand. The plaintiif was an employe of the Packing Company, engaged in work about carcasses of beeves, and was injured by the fall of a carcass upon him. He alleges that it was the duty of the Packing Company’s foreman, who is the other defendant, to repair and maintain in safe condition the appliances from which the carcass was suspended,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wecker v. National Enameling & Stamping Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Kelly v. Chicago & A. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri · 1903
  3. Floyt v. Shenango Furnace Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Minnesota · 1911
  4. Clark v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1912

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ransom v. HanerAlaska Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Knight v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1934
  3. Morefield v. Ozark Pipe Line CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1928
  4. Plunkett v. Gulf Refining Co.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1919
  5. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. WittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API