Legal Opinion

Sekerez v. Lake County Board of Commissioners

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 27, 1976No. 3-1274A211PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHoffman, J.

Plaintiff-appellant Zarko Sekerez perfected this appeal following the entry of a judgment adverse to his interests in the trial court. The present action, which was brought pursuant to Ind. Rules of Procedure, Trial Rule 57, sought to have a contract which had been entered into between defendants-appellees The Lake County Board of Commissioners (Board) and Hartmann-Sanders Company (Hartmann) declared void by reason of the alleged failure of the Board to comply with certain statutory procedures regarding the award of public works contracts. The contract in question was for the purchase and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Board of Commissioners v. GibsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Bass Foundry v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Sims v. HinesIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Board of Commissioners v. SilversIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
  5. Alsmeier v. AdamsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kenai Lumber Co., Inc. v. LeRescheAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Kenai Lumber Co., Inc. v. LeRescheAlaska Supreme Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API