Legal Opinion

Gilbert M. Hinojosa v. Christopher Schmaling, et al.

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided September 16, 2026No. 2:24-cv-01153Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN GILBERT M. HINOJOSA, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 24-CV-1153 CHRISTOPHER SCHMALING, et al., Defendants. DECISION AND ORDER Plaintiff Gilbert M. Hinojosa, who is incarcerated and representing himself, brings this lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Hinojosa was allowed to proceed on a Fourteenth Amendment claim against the defendants for allegedly failing to obtain dental care for him. The defendants filed a motion for summary judgment, which is fully briefed and ready for a decision. (ECF No. 26.) The parties have consented to the jurisdiction…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Burks v. RaemischCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  5. Owens v. HinsleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API