Hilton Head Automotive, LLC v. South Carolina Department of Transportation
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kittredge
This is an inverse condemnation case. Appellant Hilton Head Automotive, LLC, contends the South Carolina Department of Transportation’s reconfiguration of the median crossovers on U.S. Highway 278, which Appellant’s business abuts, was a taking because it deprived Appellant and its customers of the ability to enter or exit the highway by making a left turn. We disagree and affirm the decision of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the Department of Transportation.
The facts of this case are similar to those of the Hardin case as described in Hardin v. South Carolina…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Byrd v. City of HartsvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
- South Carolina State Highway Department v. WilsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1970
- City of Rock Hill v. CothranSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1946
- Sease v. City of SpartanburgSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1963
- Foster Lumber Co. v. Arkansas Valley & W. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Carolina Convenience Stores, Inc. v. City of SpartanburgCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2012
- Frampton v. South Carolina Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2013
- S.C. Dep't of Transp. v. PowellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2018
- South Carolina Department of Transportation v. PowellCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2015
- Carolina Convenience Stores v. City of SpartanburgSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2016