Debruhl v. . Hood
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Appeal by defendant from Ferguson, J., at May Term, 1911, of CRAVEN. Tbe facts are sufficiently stated in tbe opinion of tbe Court by Mr. Justice Walicer.
1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.
Tbis action was brought to enjoin tbe defendant from selling certain property under powers of sale contained in two mortgages, originally executed by plaintiff to Mrs. Sopbia B. Duffy and tbe Citizens Bank of New Bern, to secure notes of tbe plaintiff, and by tbem sold and transferred to tbe defendant. It is alleged in tbe complaint tbat several cask payments were made upon said indebtedness by tbe plaintiff, wbicb, witb tbe proceeds of certain timber cut from tbe land and received by tbe defendant, wbicb, by reason of tbe contract between tbe parties, should have been applied to tbe debt,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bissell v. HeywardSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Parker v. . BeasleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
- Soper v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1881
- Lee v. . ManleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- Bank of Charlotte v. DavidsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1874
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ingold v. Phoenix Assurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Dr. Shoop Family Medicine Co. v. DavenportSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913