Legal Opinion

In Re Petition to Recall Reese

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 17, 1995PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ZAPPALA, Justice.

The question we address is whether the recall provisions of the Kingston Home Rule Charter are constitutional. For the reasons set forth below, we find that these provisions violate Article VI, § 7 of the Pennsylvania Constitution. We therefore affirm the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Luzerne County.

Kingston, a municipality of approximately 15,000 citizens, is a home rule municipality, which form of government became effective in January, 1976. On November 2, 1993, Appellee, the Honorable Gary R. Reese, was elected to the office of mayor.

On March 6, 1995,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Addison CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  2. Citizens Committee to Recall Rizzo v. Board of ElectionsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Milford Township Supervisors' RemovalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  4. Georges Township School DirectorsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  5. County of Delaware v. Township of MiddletownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. City of Philadelphia v. SchweikerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. Norbert J. Dotzel, Jr., D/B/A Dotzel Trucking Joanne Dotzel, D/B/A Dotzel Trucking v. Ernest Ashbridge John R. Bower Darren Crispin Salem TownshipCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
  3. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. Burger v. School Board of McGuffey School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. Denbow v. Borough of LeetsdaleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API