Legal Opinion

Lanzi v. Lanzi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 9, 2002PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Goldstein, J.

At issue here is whether a parent who is institutionalized, totally disabled, and a public charge must use his income to support his medical needs, or must use his income to support his children. We hold that in determining the obligation of an institutionalized parent to pay child support pursuant to the Child Support Standards Act (hereinafter the CSSA; Family Ct Act § 413; Domestic Relations Law § 240), the Family Court must consider both the requirements of the CSSA and Social Services Law § 366-c. When awarding child support, the Family Court is not…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dutchess County Department of Social Services v. DayNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. MATTER OF ROSE v. MoodyNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. MTR OF GOMPRECHT v. GomprechtNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. MTR. OF SCHACHNER v. PeralesNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Aregano v. AreganoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Rubin v. Della SallaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  2. Calvello v. CalvelloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. Moore v. AbbanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  4. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. v. Town Board of SoutheastAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  5. Jennifer R. v. Michael C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API