Legal Opinion

MTR OF GOMPRECHT v. Gomprecht

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 29, 1995PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Smith, J.

At the time of her petition for support from her husband, brought pursuant to Family Court Act § 412, petitioner’s husband was institutionalized and receiving Medicaid. The issue here is whether in an action for spousal support by a community spouse against an institutionalized spouse, the Family Court is free to apply the prior standard of living or life-style standard rather than the minimum monthly needs allowance standard under Social Services Law § 366-c. We conclude that the appropriate standard is the minimum monthly needs allowance and, accordingly,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. MTR. OF SCHACHNER v. PeralesNew York Court of Appeals · 1995

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. In re ShahAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. Mtr. of Shah (Helen Hayes Hosp.)New York Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Vansach v. Dep't of Health & Human Servs. (In re Estate of Vansach)Michigan Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. Balzarini v. Suffolk County Department of Social ServicesNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. In re ShahAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API