MTR OF GOMPRECHT v. Gomprecht
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Smith, J.
At the time of her petition for support from her husband, brought pursuant to Family Court Act § 412, petitioner’s husband was institutionalized and receiving Medicaid. The issue here is whether in an action for spousal support by a community spouse against an institutionalized spouse, the Family Court is free to apply the prior standard of living or life-style standard rather than the minimum monthly needs allowance standard under Social Services Law § 366-c. We conclude that the appropriate standard is the minimum monthly needs allowance and, accordingly,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- MTR. OF SCHACHNER v. PeralesNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
3Cited by19 opinions
- In re ShahAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Mtr. of Shah (Helen Hayes Hosp.)New York Court of Appeals · 2000
- Vansach v. Dep't of Health & Human Servs. (In re Estate of Vansach)Michigan Court of Appeals · 2018
- Balzarini v. Suffolk County Department of Social ServicesNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
- In re ShahAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.