Legal Opinion · Dissent

Eleanor L. Burns v. Rockford Life Insurance Company

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided August 21, 1984No. 83-2772Published

1DissentGrant, Senior District Judge

I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion in this case because I believe that it inadequately addresses the real issue which confronts us.

It is clear — as the district court concluded — that there was no actionable fraud on behalf of defendant, Rockford Life Insurance Company. This is a simple issue which merits, at best, brief discussion. Rather, the real issue in this case is the legal effect of the erroneous temporary insurance receipt which defendant, Rockford Life Insurance Company, proffered to the plaintiff.

The terms of the temporary insurance receipt materially differed from…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Mutual Life Insurance v. Hurni Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. O'MEARA v. American States Insurance CompanyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. U.S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. BaughIndiana Court of Appeals · 1970
  4. Jeffries v. StewartIndiana Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co. v. NevilleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API