Legal Opinion

United States v. Sarraj

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided January 6, 2012No. 10-3609PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAMILTON, Circuit Judge.

Defendant Khalil Sarraj sought to buy guns in Illinois, allegedly for personal protection, after he was assaulted during a dispute with criminal associates. Unluckily for Sarraj, the person he asked for help acquiring guns was a confidential informant for the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives. After determining that Sarraj was a convicted felon, federal agents sold him two handguns, both manufactured outside the state of Illinois, in a “reverse sting” operation, one in which agents posed as sellers rather than buyers of contraband. Sarraj pled guilty…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  2. United States v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. United States v. BassSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Scarborough v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. Christopher SpearsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  2. United States v. Al-NashiriUnited States Court of Military Commission Review · 2016
  3. United States v. RossCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
  4. Daniels v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API