United States v. Sarraj
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HAMILTON, Circuit Judge.
Defendant Khalil Sarraj sought to buy guns in Illinois, allegedly for personal protection, after he was assaulted during a dispute with criminal associates. Unluckily for Sarraj, the person he asked for help acquiring guns was a confidential informant for the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives. After determining that Sarraj was a convicted felon, federal agents sold him two handguns, both manufactured outside the state of Illinois, in a “reverse sting” operation, one in which agents posed as sellers rather than buyers of contraband. Sarraj pled guilty…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- United States v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United States v. BassSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Scarborough v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. Christopher SpearsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Al-NashiriUnited States Court of Military Commission Review · 2016
- United States v. RossCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- Daniels v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2025