Legal Opinion

People v. Burtleson

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 23, 1896No. 683PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from the First district court, Territory of Utah. Hon. W. H. King, Judge. Andreas Burtleson was convicted of having committed a public nuisance, and appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Baetoh, J.:

This is a criminal prosecution under section 4566, Comp. Laws. Utah 1888, and the defendant was charged with having committed a public nuisance by unlawfully and willfully driving, herding, and keeping about 2,000 sheep in and upon a small stream, the water of which was used for culinary and domestic purposes by the inhabitants of the town of Annabella, in Sevier county, Utah, and by rendering the said water impure, and thereby endangering the comfort and health of three persons, named in the complaint, and divers other persons, resi- ' dents of said town, and using the water for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Susquehanna Fertilizer Co. v. MaloneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1890
  2. Seacord v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Moses v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  4. In re GannettUtah Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State ex rel. West v. ButlerSupreme Court of Florida · 1915
  2. Higgins v. Brown, JudgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  3. McCampbell v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Higgins v. Brown, JudgeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1908
  5. Erickson v. SorensenCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API