Blaker v. State

The appellant was charged with the larceny of a horse. He was prosecuted on information and convicted. Two errors are assigned:

1st. That the court erred in overruling a motion to quash the information.

2d. That the court erred in overruling a motion for a new trial.

The court did not err in overruling the motion to quash. The only ground upon whiteh the appellant argues that this motion should have been sustained is, that the information *204contains no statement that court was in session when it was. filed, and does not refer to the affidavit filed as the source of the prosecutor’s information. We…