Legal Opinion

Baird's Estate

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 5, 1929No. Appeal, 343PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Kephart,

The rule for determining the intact value of an estate, the income from which is to be paid to a life tenant with the remainder of the corpus over to designated persons, has not been definitely set forth. We know that it is fixed as of the date of testator’s death and, as indicated in Nirdlinger’s Estate, 290 Pa. 457, “intact value includes the par value of the stock, plus any accumulation of income, earned before the death of the testator......: Earp’s App.” Whether it is entitled to any further increases has not been definitely ruled. Market value has been…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Nirdlinger's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Jones v. Integrity Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  3. Graham's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  4. Packer's Estate (No. 1)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Waterhouse's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Neafie's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. King EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  4. Arrott EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  5. Tyler TrustsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API