Epstein v. Bendersky
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
1Opinion of the Court
This is a suit by a judgment creditor to set aside allegedly fraudulent transfers of bonds and mortgages and corporation stock. The bill does not show that execution issued on complainant's judgment.
Defendants move to dismiss the bill on the ground that, because of the lack of such an allegation, the bill does not show a cause of action within the jurisdiction of the court. Their argument runs thus: In 1844, when our Constitution was adopted and thereafter until the enactment of the Uniform Fraudulent Conveyance Law in 1919, a creditor's bill in equity to set aside a fraudulent conveyance of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bayard v. HoffmanNew York Court of Chancery · 1820
- Haston v. CastnerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1879
- Hedden v. HandSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1919
- United Stores Realty Corp. v. AseaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1928
- Jarrell v. Laurel Coal & Land Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1915
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re ElliottWashington Supreme Court · 1968
- 348 Bloomfield Avenue Corp. v. Montclair Mfg. Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1950
- Turtur v. SchwarzNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- Sackin v. KerstingCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
- In Re ElliottWashington Supreme Court · 1968