Legal Opinion

Ericsson GE Mobile Communications, Inc. v. Motorola Communications & Electronics, Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 17, 1995No. 1931189PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama, the Honorable William M. Acker, Jr., presiding, has certified questions in a dispute under Alabama's competitive bid law in which a dissatisfied bidder, Ericsson GE Mobile Communications, Inc. ("EGE"), has challenged the City of Birmingham's contract with Motorola Communications Electronics, Inc. ("Motorola"), for a new public safety radio communications system. This Court has agreed to answer questions concerning the appropriateness of requesting alternative bids, whether this contract qualifies as a "sole source"…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Poyner v. WhiddonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  2. White v. McDonald Ford Tractor CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1971
  3. Carson Cadillac Corporation v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  4. INTERN. TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  5. Mitchell v. Walden Motor Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1937

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ericsson GE Mobile Communications, Inc. v. Motorola Communications & Electronics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
  2. Ericsson GE Mobile Communications, Inc. v. Motorola Communications & Electronics, Inc.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1998
  3. Anderson v. Fayette County Bd. of Educ.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  4. Fitch v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API