Legal Opinion

Fredenburg v. Mental Health Division

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 29, 1991No. 89C-11042, 89C-11086, 89C-11087, 89C-11088; CA A64530PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

Appellants have petitioned for review of our opinion. 106 Or App 337, 807 P2d 812 (1991). We treat the petition as one for reconsideration, ORAP 9.15(1), allow it, modify our opinion and adhere to it.

Appellants assert that we erred in holding that Division’s consideration of their Social Security benefits did not violate 42 USC § 407(a).1 They argue that we improperly relied on the present version of ORS 179.653, rather than on the version that was in effect on the date of the administrative orders relevant to this case.

Division’s orders were issued May 12, 1989, when ORS 179.653 provided:

“If…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Fredenburg v. Mental Health DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Binder & Binder Pc v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  2. Salstrom v. StarkeColorado Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. People v. J.G. (In Re J.G.)California Supreme Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API