Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Fredenburg v. Mental Health Division

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 29, 1991No. 89C-11042, 89C-11086, 89C-11087, 89C-11088; CA A64530PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

Petitioners appeal a judgment upholding orders of the Mental Health Division (Division) that determined that they are able to pay for the cost of their care and maintenance at Oregon State Hospital (OSH) and fixed the extent of their liability. Former ORS 179.650. 1 We affirm.

Petitioners are under the jurisdiction of the Psychiatric Security Review Board (PSRB) because of adjudications under ORS 161.319 that they were guilty of criminal charges, except for insanity. They are patients in the Forensic Psychiatric Program, at OSH, which treats two groups of patients. The first group, like…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. ClarkOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Matter of Marriage of Swan and SwanOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State, Central Collection v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Binder & Binder Pc v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  2. Fredenburg v. Mental Health DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API