United States v. Hardaway Contracting Co.
District Court, E.D. South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ERNEST F. COCHRAN, District Judge.
The government brought this action, alleging in substance that the government and defendant entered into a certain contract for the construction of certain works during the prosecution of the recent war, and that the defendant represented that it had the facilities for the prosecution of such work, when in fact it did not have such facilities, and that the defendant also by its fraud and negligence in the prosecution of the work l' rendered tho eost thereof excessive. The contract is what is known as a “eost plus contract,” and under the terms of the contract…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Liberty Oil Co. v. Condon National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Southern Railway Co. v. CliftSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- United States v. Mason & Hanger Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- United States v. A. Bentley & Sons Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1923
- United States v. Mason & Hanger Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
3Cited by7 opinions
- (PC) Foote v. El Dorado County CourtsDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
- (PC) Jackson v. GarciaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
- (PC) Lazar v. JonesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
- (PC) Miles v. PetersenDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
- (PC) Vardazaryan v. BreenDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.