Klein v. Tuhey
Indiana Court of Appeals
From the Delaware Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtGavin, J.
The appellant by appeal to the circuit court questioned the validity of a precept for a sewer *75assessment made against Ms property by the council of the city of Muncie. The proceedings were under the amended Barrett law, Acts 1889, page 237, R. S. 1894, sections 4288-4298 inclusive.
By the terms of this law, after the completion of the work, the engineer reports the fact to council, together with the total cost thereof and an apportionment of the cost to the lots benefited thereby in proportion to such benefits, whereupon the council must give two weeks’ notice, in a newspaper published in such…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Stuart v. . PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Quill v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. EdgertonIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Weaver v. TemplinIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- McEneney v. Town of SullivanIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Ross v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
- Keeling v. Board of Zoning AppealsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1946
- Elmendorf v. City of San AntonioCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
- Baldwin v. MoroneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
- State ex rel. Dorgan v. FiskNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1906
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.