Legal Opinion

McClellan v. Downey

California Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1883PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

Myrick J.

This appeal comes before us on the judgment roll, embracing the pleadings, findings, and judgment. The action was brought by plaintiff, a distributee of the estate of her father, W. J. McClellan, against a surety on the bond of the administrator, to recover the amount of money distributed to *521her by the decree of distribution made of the estate of her said father. The following are sufficient of the facts to explain the case:—

W. J. McClellan died intestate, leaving, him surviving, his wife, Susan A. E. McClellan, and six children, four of whom were the children of his marriage with…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Shattuck v. ShattuckArizona Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Treweek v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Estate of HerriottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  4. In re the Estate of SbarboroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Gibson v. GordonArizona Supreme Court · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API