Legal Opinion
Golub v. Baer, Marks & Upham
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 1, 1991PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for breach of contract and professional malpractice, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Roncallo, J.), entered August 18, 1989, which granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss the amended complaint, with prejudice, on the ground that the causes of action asserted therein were barred by the Statute of Limitations, and denied the plaintiffs’ cross motion for a protective order and sanctions as academic.
Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is denied, the amended complaint is reinstated, and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Video Corp. of America v. Frederick Flatto Associates, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Key International Manufacturing, Inc. v. Morse/Diesel, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Kupplungbau GmbH v. LernerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Muller v. SturmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Stampfel v. EckhardtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Sobel v. AnsanelliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Nate B. & Frances Spingold Foundation v. Wallin, Simon, Black & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Mark G. v. SabolAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Padilla v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Sobel v. AnsanelliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012