Legal Opinion

Rudansky v. Rudansky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 30, 1996PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (David Saxe, J.), entered April 18, 1995, awarding plaintiff temporary maintenance and interim counsel fees, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The parties’ intention to reconcile and abandon their separation agreement was established by proof of their resumption of *501the marital relationship by unequivocal acts (see, Lippman v Lippman, 192 AD2d 1060,1061), including their living together and resuming marital relations, their selling of their separate apartments and purchase of a new apartment, plaintiffs quitting her job and resuming a role as a housewife…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Aron v. AronAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. Pasquale v. PasqualeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. Lippman v. LippmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  4. Cohen v. CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  5. Rothberg v. RothbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Martin v. MartinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API