Hamilton v. Lau
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error to the district court for York county. Tried below before NorvÁl, J. cited: Wallace v. Wainwright, 87 Penn. State, 263. Page v. Smith, 24 Wis., 368. Dickson v. Rawson, 5 Ohio State, 218. Bonus v. Garter, 20 Neb., 566.
1Opinion of the CourtCobb, J.
This was an action in the district court of York county. The plaintiff, by his petition, alleged that, on the 16th day of February, 1886, one Elon Granger was the owner and in possession of a stock of goods, wares, and merchandise in the city of York, in York county, and then indebted to and owing plaintiff in the sum of $950, and it was on the said day agreed by and between the plaintiff and said Granger that the said Granger should sell and transfer said stock of goods, wares, and merchandise to plaintiff, in payment of the said sum .of $950 then due and owing *60from said Granger to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bonns v. CarterNebraska Supreme Court · 1886
- Tuttle v. HanneganNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1871
3Cited by3 opinions
- M. P. Musser & Co. v. KingNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- Stephens v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1895
- United States v. American Surety Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois · 1907