Legal Opinion

State v. Plenty Horse

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 7, 2007No. 24370PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KONENKAMP, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Under South Dakota law, the crime of indecent exposure prohibits the public exposure of one’s genitals for the purpose of arousing sexual desire in oneself or another. Defendant was convicted of this offense after he was surprised by a security guard while alone in a public building attempting to have sexual intercourse with a mannequin. Although counsel for defendant offers several theories on why this conviction should be reversed, the only meritorious question before us is whether defendant’s conduct fell within the purview of the statute. We conclude that because…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Woodby v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. State v. TofaniSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State v. JorgensenSupreme Court of Iowa · 2008
  2. State v. IsaacSupreme Court of Iowa · 2008
  3. State v. MorseSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State v. GuthmillerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  5. State v. BrendeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API