Legal Opinion
George A. Hormel & Company v. United Food & Commercial Workers, Local 9, Afl-Cio, United Food & Commercial Workers, Local 9, Afl-Cio v. George A. Hormel & Company
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided August 21, 1989No. 88-5352PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
879 F.2d 347
131 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3018, 58 USLW 2115,
112 Lab.Cas. P 11,336
GEORGE A. HORMEL & COMPANY, Appellant,
v.
UNITED FOOD & COMMERCIAL WORKERS, LOCAL 9, AFL-CIO, Appellee.
UNITED FOOD & COMMERCIAL WORKERS, LOCAL 9, AFL-CIO,
v.
GEORGE A. HORMEL & COMPANY.
No. 88-5352.
United States Court of Appeals,
Eighth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 22, 1988.
Decided July 12, 1989.
Rehearing En Banc Denied Aug. 18, 1989.
Rehearing Denied Aug. 21, 1989.
Thomas P. Krukowski, Milwaukee, Wis., for appellant.
Robert D. Metcalf, Minneapolis, Minn., for appellee.
Before JOHN R. GIBSON, WOLLMAN and BEAM, Circuit Judges.
BEAM,…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United Paperworkers International Union v. Misco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Carbon Fuel Co. v. United Mine WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Clinchfield Coal Company v. District 28, United Mine Workers of America & Local Union 1452, Westmoreland Coal Company, Amicus CuriaeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
- Inter-City Gas Corp. v. Boise Cascade Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Keebler Co. v. Milk Drivers & Dairy Employees Union, Local No. 471Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- Keebler Company v. Milk Drivers And Dairy Employees Union, Local No. 471Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- Exide Technologies v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local No. 700District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 2019