Riehl v. De Quaine
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, C. J.
Plaintiffs raise these two contentions on this appeal:(1) Mr. Riehl was confronted with an emergency and should be absolved of any negligence as a matter of law.(2) Mrs. Riehl is entitled to a new trial in the interest of justice because the damages are inadequate.
Emergency Issue.
The accident giving rise to Mrs, Riehl’s injuries occurred at about 8:30 p. m. on Walnut street, which runs in an easterly and westerly direction between the intersections of such street with Jefferson and Adams streets. The Riehl car was traveling westerly and the De Quaine car easterly. Mrs. Riehl was sitting in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Schumacher v. KlabundeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Papacosta v. PapacostaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
- Klas v. FenskeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1946
- Morrill v. KomasinskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1950
- Havens v. HavensWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Ver Hagen v. GibbonsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
- Geis v. HirthWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Redepenning v. DoreWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
- Rennick v. Fruehauf Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- Cook v. ThomasWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.