Legal Opinion

Heilbronn v. New York Life Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 15, 1934PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgments for the defendants in actions by the insured upon total disability provisions of insurance policies unanimously affirmed, with costs. (1) The plaintiff and the defendants agreed upon the form of the questions to be submitted to the jury, defining the issues of fact. The plaintiff agreed that the submission should be made upon the theory that in order to recover he was obligated to establish that he was “ wholly disabled.” The final submission to the jury was under a charge that left the jury free to apply the language of the policies in their plain, ordinary and proper sense, which…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Muzio v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
  2. D'Angelis v. LitwinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  3. Jersey v. Travelers InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Siff v. Travelers InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API