Legal Opinion
Henderson v. Sarle
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 11, 1960PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBernard S. Meyer, J.
In a proceeding begun by order to show cause accompanied only by an affidavit, deponent Henderson, alleging that he is a member of a union, seeks an order directing respondents to produce for his inspection books and records of the union. The application is purportedly made under subdivision c of section 201 of the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act of 1959 (U. S. Code, tit. 29, § 431, subd. c), which provides: “Every labor organization required to submit a report under this subchapter shall make available the information required to be contained in such report to all of its…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Riley v. Agwilines, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1947
- Levine v. LendingNew York Supreme Court · 1941
- Fitzgerald v. ConwayNew York Supreme Court · 1948
- Simmons v. Rudolph Knitting Mills, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
- Crean v. BruckmanNew York Supreme Court · 1942
3Cited by5 opinions
- State Division of Human Rights v. New York State Department of Correctional ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Solomon v. HirschNew York Supreme Court · 1962
- Deacon v. International Union of Operating EngineersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Henderson v. SarleNew York Supreme Court · 1960
- Bettman v. MichaelisNew York Supreme Court · 1961