Legal Opinion
2600 University Inn, LLC v. City of Minneapolis
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided November 19, 1996No. C5-96-1031Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PETERSON, Judge.
This appeal is from an amended summary judgment entered in favor of respondents in this action to amend the Minneapolis zoning ordinance. Two Minneapolis property owners argue that the district court erred in determining that (1) consent to a zoning amendment from one owner of a jointly-owned property constitutes consent to the amendment on behalf of all owners of the property and (2) consent from neighboring property owners to an amended rezoning petition is not required when the amended petition seeks a less-intensive use. We reverse.
FACTS
Respondent National Lodging…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Offerdahl v. University of Minnesota Hospitals & ClinicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- State Ex Rel. Rochester Ass'n of Neighborhoods v. City of RochesterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Green Giant Co. v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- Beck v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Schumacher v. IhrkeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.