Legal Opinion

Judd v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Indianapolis

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided June 23, 1983No. 82-2143PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAUER, Circuit Judge.

After a one-day bench trial, the district court ruled for Defendant Meridian Mortgage Company, finding that the mortgages at issue did not create trusts for the benefit of the mortgagors. We affirm.

I

Forrest and Iva Judd filed a class action complaint in 1976, alleging that several defendant banks and savings and loan institutions conspired to force mortgagors to pay in advance certain taxes, insurance premiums, and rents without compensating the mortgagors for the institutions’ use of the money. Although the action was initiated under several Indiana and federal statutes,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. La Throp v. Bell Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Brooks v. Valley National BankArizona Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Ethyl Corp. v. Forcum-Lannom Associates, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Carpenter v. Suffolk Franklin Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  5. Brown v. BrownIndiana Supreme Court · 1956

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Nancy S. Marchiando, Debtor-Appellee. Appeal of State of Illinois, Department of the LotteryCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  2. Eugene Telfair v. First Union Mortgage CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
  3. Saul Catalan v. RBC Mortgage CompanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  4. Spinoso v. Heilman (In Re Heilman)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · 1999
  5. Huntington Mortgage Co. v. DeBrotaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API