Legal Opinion

Touchcom, Inc. v. Bereskin & Parr

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided October 6, 2008No. 2008-1229PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON MOTION

MAYER, Circuit Judge.

ORDER

Bereskin & Parr (B & P) and H. Samuel Frost move to disqualify the law firms of Wildman, Harrold, Allen & Dixon, LLP (Wildman Harrold) and Capsalis, Bruce & Reaser PLC (Capsalis Bruce) from representing Touchcom, Inc. et al. (Touchcom) in this appeal. Touchcom opposes. B & P and Frost reply.

B & P is a Canadian intellectual property firm, and Frost is a patent agent who works for B & P. Frost prepared a series of patent applications for Touchcom that resulted in the issuance of a United States patent. Touchcom sued Dresser, Inc. in 2003 alleging that Dresser…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Allegaert v. PerotCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  2. Koch v. Koch IndustriesDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1992
  3. Atasi Corporation v. Seagate TechnologyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  4. In Re Joseph D. MorrisseyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002
  5. Host Marriott Corp. v. Fast Food Operators, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Audio MPEG, Inc. v. Dell, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2016
  2. Gulf Coast Marketing Group, Inc. v. JTH Tax LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2021
  3. ROAD KING DEVELOPMENT, INC. v. JTH Tax, LLC, d/b/a Liberty Tax ServiceDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2021
  4. Valeant International Bermuda v. Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API