Legal Opinion

Keefauver v. Richardson

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 18, 1964No. [No. 183, September Term, 1963.]PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Marbury J.,

delivered the opinion of the Court.

To be resolved on this appeal is the question of which of the parties has superior claim to lots numbered 33 to 36 inclusive, in the subdivision known as “Shanabrooke’s Resubdivision of Central Heights”, College Park, Maryland. The appellants, J. Earl Keefauver and his wife, claim the property by virtue of tax titles and adverse possession, while the appellee James E. Richardson, Jr. presents his claim under a right of redemption.

Pursuant to Code (1957), Article 81, § 97, et seq., the appellants filed a bill in equity in the Circuit Court for…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Levin v. SingerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
  2. Perdue v. BrittinghamCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
  3. Hamlin MacHine Co. v. Holtite Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  4. Bolton Mines Co. v. StokesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1895
  5. State Roads Commission v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Fearnow v. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  2. Haley v. CorcoranDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2009
  3. Hardisty v. KayCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  4. Kasdon v. G. W. Zierden Landscaping, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1982
  5. Prince George's Homes, Inc. v. CahnCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API