McNally v. Connolly
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.
Whether the title to the property in question passed to the plaintiffs in the present action depends *4upon its character at the time of the levy of and sale under the execution issued in the case entitled McNally et al. v. Connolly & Wheat,—that is to say, whether as between the plaintiffs, who were the creditors, and Connolly & Wheat, who were the debtors, the property was realty or personalty.
The facts of the case are these:—
In 1876 the defendant took a lease of a certain lot of land in the city of San Francisco for a term which was to expire January 1, 1881. Upon the lot there was a brick…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Sands v. PfeifferCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
3Cited by17 opinions
- Trabue Pittman Corp. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- City of Los Angeles v. HughesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Oakland Bank of Savings v. California Pressed Brick Co.California Supreme Court · 1920
- Morey v. HoytSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1893
- In Re SullivanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.