Weidenfeld v. Tillinghast
New York City Court
Action by Camille Weidqnfeld against Henry Tillinghast. On motion for an order canceling a judgment pursuant to a discharge of the defendant in bankruptcy.
1Opinion of the CourtWadhams, J.
Motion is made, pursuant to section 1268 of the Code of Civil Procedure, for an order canceling the judgment herein on the ground that the defendant has been discharged from his debts in bankruptcy.
Section 7, subd. 8, of the bankruptcy act (Act July 1, 1898, c. 541, 30 Stat. 548 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3425]), requires the bankrupt to file a schedule of his property and a list of his creditors, “showing their residences, if known; if unknown, that fact to be stated.” By section 17, subd. 3, it is provided that a discharge in bankruptcy shall release a bankrupt from all of his provable…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Birkett v. Columbia BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- West Co. v. LeaSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Columbia Bank v. . BirkettNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
- Tyrrel v. HammersteinNew York Supreme Court · 1900
- Graber v. GaultAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Calmenson v. MoudrySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
- Lutz v. KalmusAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1909